It's like @Kleith mentions, just a rule of 3 and I quote:
The value in em
, applied in a formula would be something like valorEnPixles / padreEnPixeles
, in your example, 26 / 30 eso da 0.86em
.
Now you must remember, that the idea of using ems
, is precisely not recalculating the inherited measures, so that they are "pixel perfect" and doing that calculation would always be a lost time, above all if you are all the time manipulating the base measure of the parent container. It simply has no case.
What I recommend, is that you are not clear yet, is to look for examples, why it is currently recommended to use " em
" instead of pixel
in certain cases and change "the ship" in the form of layout, because you are pretending to use a dynamic measure as if it were a static measure and the truth, if you really need to use specific measures, it will always be better to use the measure directly in pixeles
and not in em
.